Philippe Bracke, Matt Everitt, Martina Fazio and Alexandra Varadi

The Financial institution of England Agenda for Analysis (BEAR) units the important thing areas for brand new analysis on the Financial institution over the approaching years. This submit is an instance of points thought of underneath the Macroeconomic Surroundings Theme which focuses on the altering inflation dynamics and unfolding structural change confronted by financial coverage makers.
How do mortgagors regulate spending, financial savings and debt throughout financial tightening? In a latest paper, we discover this query utilizing a novel knowledge set on family transactions and mortgage data. About 30% of households used mortgage flexibility when going through larger borrowing prices since late 2021, as their fixed-rate contracts ended. Some prolonged compensation durations to decrease month-to-month funds, whereas others elevated borrowing by extracting housing fairness – leveraging nominal worth features for the reason that pandemic – to maintain spending and cut back unsecured debt. These unable or unwilling to make use of mortgage flexibility, minimize spending considerably. We thus doc the twin function of mortgage flexibility at refinancing: it helps easy consumption aiding monetary resilience; however it might additionally dampen financial coverage transmission for some households.
The mortgage market channel of financial coverage transmission
Within the UK, long-term fixed-rate mortgage contracts are comparatively unusual and refinancing happens each 2–5 years to keep away from rolling onto way more costly customary variable charges. Since a third of the UK inhabitants has a mortgage, and refinancing is frequent, the pass-through of financial coverage to the mortgage market is stronger than in nations with longer fixed-term contracts, such because the US. Thus, the mortgage market is an particularly essential channel of transmission of financial coverage within the UK. When rates of interest rise, mortgage funds improve too, instantly decreasing households’ disposable earnings (the ‘cash-flow channel’). Though many owners maintain substantial wealth in housing, this wealth is illiquid and can’t be accessed in the course of the fixed-rate interval of the mortgage. UK lenders impose punitive early compensation expenses for altering mortgage phrases, withdrawing house fairness or promoting properties earlier than the tip of the fixed-term contract.
We present that on the refinancing occasion, about one-in-three households depend on two key dimensions of mortgage flexibility to mitigate the influence of the cash-flow channel. First, rising property values between refinancing occasions enhance householders’ wealth, permitting them to extend borrowing towards their property through house fairness extraction. This collateral-driven borrowing is related to larger spending and unsecured-debt repayments. Second, lengthening mortgage compensation durations – referred to as ‘mortgage time period extensions’ within the UK – helps households cut back month-to-month mortgage repayments. They’re typically utilized in mixture with house fairness withdrawals to decrease debt burdens from the extra borrowing. Desk A summarises the influence that these mortgage flexibility measures have on mortgage holders, which we discover on this submit.
Desk A: Mortgage flexibility measures and their influence on mortgage repayments
Affect on month-to-month repayments | Collateral-driven borrowing | |
Fairness extraction | Improve | Sure – lump sum at refinancing |
Time period extension | Lower | No – extra capital borrowed |
Each | Ambiguous (the 2 will offset one another) | Sure – lump sum at refinancing |
Figuring out the impact of rising mortgage charges on family spending and debt behaviour
To determine the impact of rising mortgage charges, we exploit 4 distinctive options of the UK mortgage market and a novel matched knowledge set.
First, we exploit the quasi-exogenous timing of refinancing within the UK. Cloyne et al (2019) reveals that within the UK, when households select a fixed-term contract size for his or her mortgage charge, they’re unable to completely foresee the macroeconomic circumstances they’ll face when the fixed-rate contractual interval ends. As such, the timing of refinancing onto a brand new fixed-rate contract is impartial from present households’ traits. Our technique for causal identification follows Di Maggio et al (2017). We use a difference-in-difference strategy to match households refinancing in the course of the tightening cycle (June 2022 to December 2023) – our handled items – to family who refinanced earlier (earlier than December 2021) – our management items. We management for demand-driven components that will have an effect on mortgage charges at refinancing independently of financial coverage tightening, corresponding to mortgage to values (as a proxy for borrower riskiness), earnings, time-invariant household-specific traits and broader time-varying financial shocks, like inflation. The residual captures family responses which are due particularly to the mountaineering cycle.
Second, we exploit the truth that rising borrowing prices had been preceded by sturdy nominal property appreciation. By late 2022, mortgage holders confronted among the steepest charge will increase in many years, but home worth development was 20% larger than the pre-pandemic interval. This surroundings uncovers a novel configuration – the same old dampening of demand from larger borrowing prices is partly offset by elevated borrowing towards sturdy collateral values skilled for the reason that earlier refinancing occasion.
Third, we exploit the design of mortgage flexibility gives within the UK which permits us to separate it from any modifications households make after their new rate of interest is realised. Mortgage flexibility choices are agreed on the remortgage software stage, sometimes 3–6 months earlier than the refinancing occasion when new fixed-term contracts are locked in. Households observe the realised rate of interest shock solely on the refinancing date when new contracts begin. The delay between software and refinancing helps us separate the choice to make use of flexibility from subsequent consumption changes. We present that households don’t behave in another way in anticipation of latest mortgage contract phrases, in step with the literature. As well as, we evaluate handled and controls who make the identical mortgage flexibility decisions, to minimise any systematic variations between households. Because of this, we isolate the impact of the rising mortgage charges on consumption, debt and financial savings, conditional on a selected sort of mortgage flexibility selection.
Lastly, we use a novel knowledge set from ExactOne’s app known as ClearScore, which gives budgeting recommendation based mostly on up-to-date well timed family transactions. We mix this with UK loan-level mortgages from the Product Gross sales Database (PSD) to acquire a close to full view of UK family spending, unsecured debt and liquid financial savings. Our pattern follows round 60,000 customers between 2021–23. We present that our matched ExactOne-PSD pattern is consultant throughout debtors’ age, regional distribution, debt traits, financial savings and expenditure when in comparison with the universe of mortgages obtainable in PSD and knowledge from the Workplace of Nationwide Statistics.
The influence of upper mortgage funds on family funds relies upon tremendously on mortgage flexibility
Month-to-month mortgage funds elevated by round 20% on common in the course of the mountaineering cycle. In response, mixture spending throughout all affected households dropped briefly by about 3% on the refinancing occasion in comparison with management items who refinanced earlier than the mountaineering cycle (pink line, chart 1a). Nonetheless, family reactions to larger rates of interest trusted their take-up of mortgage flexibility. Households who didn’t modify their loans lowered spending by practically 5% for six months relative to controls (blue line, chart 1a). In distinction, households who used mortgage flexibility (round 30% of our pattern) briefly elevated spending by 5% and consolidated their unsecured debt portfolios in comparison with management items who refinanced earlier than the coverage mountaineering cycle and used related mortgage flexibility measures (inexperienced strains, Chart 1a and b). We present that take-up of mortgage flexibility is strongly correlated with wealthier hand-to-mouth debtors – ie these having larger property wealth, larger earnings and decrease financial savings.
Chart 1 additionally reveals that previous to the refinancing occasion (at time 0), there isn’t a distinction in behaviours between handled and controls, assuaging issues round anticipation results, particularly provided that mortgage flexibility decisions are determined upfront of the refinancing occasion.
Chart 1: Affect of mortgage changes at refinancing
(a) Whole non-housing spending | (b) Unsecured debt repayments |

Heterogeneity throughout collateral-driven borrowing
We discover a sturdy affiliation between collateral-driven borrowing and households’ stability sheet readjustments. As an illustration, the better the property worth features for the reason that earlier refinancing occasion, the bigger the house fairness extraction and the following spending and saving buffers that households construct (pink and inexperienced strains, Chart 2). This illustrates how leveraging home worth appreciation at refinancing may also help family construct monetary resilience towards shocks. Certainly, our paper reveals that an essential issue within the choice of how a lot house fairness to extract is having low liquid financial savings.
Chart 2: Affect of housing collateral appreciation for the borrowing and spending behaviour of households extracting fairness
(a) Whole non-housing spending | (b) Saving balances |

As well as, we discover that extending mortgage phrases at refinancing amplifies the hyperlink between collateral-driven borrowing and spending. By borrowing extra towards their house, households are more likely to see will increase of their month-to-month mortgage repayments past the consequences of the tightening cycle. Extending the compensation interval helps unfold the price over time, making funds extra manageable. Households who each extract fairness and improve mortgage phrases concurrently, are capable of improve their spending on influence by practically 20% (blue line, Chart 3a) relative to regulate items. In distinction, borrowing extra with out extending phrases results in spending responses not statistically totally different from management items, suggesting that fairness extraction was used to maintain spending unchanged – ie easy the shock to mortgage repayments (pink line, Chart 3a). This result’s pushed by larger borrowing potential when each mortgage flexibility measures are used. Particularly, households are capable of borrow £15,000 extra if additionally they lengthen mortgage phrases at refinancing, in comparison with the common fairness extractor within the management group (blue line, Chart 3b).
Chart 3: Affect of fairness extraction and time period extensions at refinancing
(a) Whole non-housing spending for fairness extractors | (b) Fairness extraction |

What does this all imply for coverage?
Our findings reveal that in durations of rising rates of interest, about one-in-three households depend on extra borrowing and on extending mortgage compensation phrases, with a purpose to easy the influence of upper month-to-month mortgage repayments. These not exploiting these flexibility measures when refinancing, lowered their spending materially when confronted with an increase in borrowing prices. Whereas mortgage flexibility has dampened the transmission of financial coverage tightening for some teams, it additionally enhanced the monetary resilience of mortgagors to unfavourable earnings shocks. Future analysis may look into their cyclicality: do mortgage time period extensions and fairness extractions result in better debt persistence over the life cycle, impacting households’ future monetary outcomes, or are they reversed in subsequent durations?
Philippe Bracke and Matt Everitt work within the Financial institution’s Superior Analytics Division, and Martina Fazio and Alexandra Varadi work within the Financial institution’s Macrofinancial Danger Division.
If you wish to get in contact, please e-mail us at bankunderground@bankofengland.co.uk or go away a remark beneath.
Feedback will solely seem as soon as accredited by a moderator, and are solely printed the place a full title is provided. Financial institution Underground is a weblog for Financial institution of England employees to share views that problem – or help – prevailing coverage orthodoxies. The views expressed listed here are these of the authors, and should not essentially these of the Financial institution of England, or its coverage committees.
Share the submit “When mortgage flexibility meets financial coverage tightening: heterogeneous impacts on spending and debt”